Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 12:44:15 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Cc: allan AT object-forge DOT com Subject: Re: Process limit Message-ID: <20001111124415.A24272@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com, allan AT object-forge DOT com References: <20001110133756 DOT B20091 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i In-Reply-To: ; from allan@object-forge.com on Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 03:38:43PM -0000 On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 03:38:43PM -0000, Allan Clearwaters wrote: >I know you don't want to commit but how soon is "...soon" - days, weeks? >The reason for my question relates to some work I'm doing where I suspect >the process limit under the current version of 1.1 is getting in my way. In >any case, if there were no process limit then it would allow me a bit more >freedom. You're right that I steadfastly refuse to give release dates, especially when prodded. It sets a dangerous precedent. Look back over the cygwin mailing list in the last few weeks and draw your own conclusions. >While we're on the subject, are there any good reference sites about the >Windows process/task api either in general or under Cygwin? The process/task api in cygwin is the same as UNIX. What would you expect? Windows APIs are documented on the Microsoft site. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com