Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 12:15:00 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: Cygwin Mailing List Subject: Re: RedHat != FSF Message-ID: <20001105121459.A22444@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin Mailing List References: <20001104144913 DOT D13650 AT redhat DOT com> <20001105120857 DOT B22200 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i In-Reply-To: <20001105120857.B22200@redhat.com>; from cgf@redhat.com on Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 12:08:57PM -0500 On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 12:08:57PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 02:44:09PM +0100, stefan wrote: >>> We provide "buy out" licenses to customers that allow the customer to >>> provide software that they've written to use the Cygwin DLL without >>> "infecting" their code with the GPL. >> >>That might be quite complicated too, if these people who do not want to >>get "infected" start using the libraries Cygwin additionally puts to their >>distribution because most of them are GPL'd. > >What libraries would those be? AFAIK, only readline is GPLed and not >LGPLed? I meant to say "AFAIK, only readline and cygwin are GPLed. The rest are LGPLed." Regardless, this is an issue for people who purchase the cygwin buyout. There are very few people affected by this consideration. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com