Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 12:08:57 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: RedHat != FSF
Message-ID: <20001105120857.B22200@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References: <20001104144913 DOT D13650 AT redhat DOT com> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10011051432590 DOT 472-100000 AT bono DOT reversers DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10011051432590.472-100000@bono.reversers.net>; from stefan@lkcc.org on Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 02:44:09PM +0100

On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 02:44:09PM +0100, stefan wrote:
>> We provide "buy out" licenses to customers that allow the customer to
>> provide software that they've written to use the Cygwin DLL without
>> "infecting" their code with the GPL.
>
>That might be quite complicated too, if these people who do not want to
>get "infected" start using the libraries Cygwin additionally puts to their
>distribution because most of them are GPL'd.

What libraries would those be?  AFAIK, only readline is GPLed and not
LGPLed?

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com