Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.0.20001104134426.00c37450@pop.bresnanlink.net> X-Sender: cabbey AT pop DOT bresnanlink DOT net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2000 13:55:19 -0600 To: From: Chris Abbey Subject: Re: test report on ver 1.1.5-4 In-Reply-To: References: <3A0436CD DOT B8B6B7D6 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 20:14 11/4/00 +0100, stefan wrote: >I forgot: All this contribution/assign thingies are far to complicated for >me as a programmer. It makes it unnecessarily delay. As I concluded from >what i read RedHat is the owner of the cygwin1.dll ? So why is there a >"net community" helping so much ??? yeah, kinda makes your head hurt doesn't it. :( Here's why I (and a few others that I know) try to do what little we can to help the project: even though RedHat owns it, they've made a commitment to the community and have not (to my knowledge yet anyway) broken that commitment, and it is a project that makes our jobs and our lives easier, saner, and just plain better so it is also in *our* best interest to make Cygwin whole and viable; because the options are thin and few, we have to use Windows for some reason, but that doesn't mean we have to like it, and it doesn't mean we have to suffer through it; sure we could pick up a commercial product like (shudder) MKS or GNUPro - and if we're working on a major commercial application we will, but fiscally that isn't always an option. now the forces of openness have a powerful and unexpected new ally http://ibm.com/linux/ -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com