Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <20001102144124.22661.qmail@web116.yahoomail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 06:41:24 -0800 (PST) From: Earnie Boyd Subject: Re: latest cygwin does not track pwd? To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 02:18:23PM -0500, Robinow, David wrote: > >> It's definitely 'getcwd(NULL, 0)' in Chuck's sources. > > Also in 5.7.0 development sources. > >> I think I'll just revert the behavior. It appears that a number of > >> packages are expecting it. > > Is there a reason these packages can't be fixed? > > Is 'getcwd(NULL, -1)' broken in some version? > > Not that I know of, but Corinna has pointed out that some versions of linux > suggest that getcwd(NULL, 0) is ok and, possibly, BSD allows this > construction. > OpenBSD reference http://www.rocketaware.com/man/man3/getcwd.3.htm > So, I think we'll be constantly responding to this on the mailing list. I'd > rather just "fix" cygwin. > I have yet to find a reference that allows a size of zero. Cheers, ===== Earnie Boyd mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com --- --- --- Cygwin: POSIX on Windows --- --- Minimalist GNU for Windows --- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? From homework help to love advice, Yahoo! Experts has your answer. http://experts.yahoo.com/ -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com