Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <39FD8D9C.9008C843@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 10:02:52 -0500 From: "Charles S. Wilson" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: DJ Delorie CC: Andrej DOT Borsenkow AT mow DOT siemens DOT ru, Cygwin AT Sourceware DOT Cygnus DOT Com Subject: Re: Default location for src install References: <000001c04244$27ecbed0$21c9ca95 AT mow DOT siemens DOT ru> <200010301408 DOT JAA25182 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DJ Delorie wrote: > > > If I select src's in new setup, they are installed under cygwin root. Is it > > intentional? It looks, like /usr/src is better (default) choice. > > They install wherever the tarball says to install them. We've been > following the GNU convention of source tarballs installing in a > subdirectory named after the package/version. But, DJ, the GNU convention doesn't require that the tarballs are unpacked from '/'. I think the suggestion was '/usr/src/package/version/lots-of-files' not '/usr/src/lots-of-files' > Of course, if you can convince us to special-case source tarballs, > we'd accept a patch to change setup to force them into /usr/src. I don't think it was a special-case request, just a request to add a dialog to select the top-level directory under which package/version subdirs appear. 'Course, the source is available... I'm not arguing for or against; personally, it makes no difference to me. --Chuck -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com