Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:31:27 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: [patch] ambiguous else
Message-ID: <20001027113127.A31974@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References: <17B78BDF120BD411B70100500422FC6309E147 AT IIS000>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To: <17B78BDF120BD411B70100500422FC6309E147@IIS000>; from Dautrevaux@microprocess.com on Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 02:21:12PM +0200

On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 02:21:12PM +0200, Bernard Dautrevaux wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jimen Ching [mailto:jching AT flex DOT com]
>> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 6:53 AM
>> To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
>> Subject: [patch] ambiguous else
>> 
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Can someone verify that the following patch is needed.
>> 
>> Also, in exceptions.cc, there is a comment in interrupt_setup 
>> which says
>> it is not multi-thread aware.  I am running into a strange 
>> problem where I
>> see an error about "couldn't send signal 14" and "wait for 
>> sig_complete
>> event failed, ..."  Are these related?  Can someone give me 
>> some hints as
>> to where to start looking if I want to know why these 
>> messages are showing
>> up?  Thanks.
>> 
>> --jc
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> diff -u -r1.51 sigproc.cc
>> --- sigproc.cc	2000/10/23 20:50:36	1.51
>> +++ sigproc.cc	2000/10/26 03:47:13
>> @@ -1121,10 +1121,12 @@
>>         * this thread should terminate.
>>         */
>>        if (rc == WAIT_TIMEOUT)
>> +	{
>>  	  if (!sig_loop_wait)
>>  	    break;			// Exiting
>>  	  else
>>  	    continue;
>> +	}
>>  
>>        if (rc == WAIT_FAILED)
>>  	{
>> 
>
>
>These are not *needed*, but having them avoids anybody to wonder if the code
>is doing this or that...

The indentation should be a clue here.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com