Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <39F97626.5D921242@cygnus.com> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 23:33:42 +1100 From: Andrew Cagney X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (X11; U; NetBSD 1.5_BETA i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bgat AT open-widgets DOT com Cc: Benjamin Riefenstahl , gdb AT sources DOT redhat DOT com, cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin gdb-5.0 h8300 sim needs wait.h References: <20001010092621 DOT A21489 AT sol DOT open-widgets DOT com> <39E337A7 DOT 3BEB0692 AT ision DOT net> <20001010111458 DOT A22246 AT sol DOT open-widgets DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit bgat AT open-widgets DOT com wrote: > > Benny: > > > My docs say that wait() should be declared in . On my > > machine Cygwin has that header and it does indeed declare wait(). > > Doh. > > My linux box has a /usr/include/wait.h that just includes > sys/wait.h. When I failed to find /usr/include/wait.h on my cygwin > box, I looked no further. > > Indeed, there *is* a /usr/include/sys/wait.h in cygwin. For some > reason, though, there is no /usr/include/wait.h, and that's what gdb > wants. I created one, and now I'm building again. > > Who is right, do you think? Should gdb really be #including > , or should cygwin offer a /usr/include/wait.h? Cygwin is more correct than GDB. The last thing cygwin needs is a :-) That file should try to include and then . To see how to fix it have a look at the src/gdb and now gdb_wait.h is setup. Andrew -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com