Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 09:20:16 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Cc: Johan DOT Niklasson AT uab DOT ericsson DOT se Subject: Re: gdb5.0 on cygwin B20.1, compiler problems Message-ID: <20001025092016.A5044@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com, Johan DOT Niklasson AT uab DOT ericsson DOT se References: <39F6CEEA DOT 82716197 AT uab DOT ericsson DOT se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i In-Reply-To: <39F6CEEA.82716197@uab.ericsson.se>; from Johan.Niklasson@uab.ericsson.se on Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 02:15:38PM +0200 On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 02:15:38PM +0200, Johan Niklasson wrote: >I have been trying for a few days now to compile gdb-5.0 >I have a NT sp4 machine >Cygwin B20.1 >gcc 2.7.2 (comes with the cygwin-release) > >I have been forced to change some lines in the makefiles because >obviously configure >have some problems. I'm currently stuck on win32-nat.c. And I was >wondering if you have an example of a makefile for gdb that works. It'd >be great to compare with. >I've been looking at the different mailinglist but have not found any >answer. > >If you haven't got any I'd like to know if you have any experience to >share. 1) Don't use B20.1. It is old. Check out http://www.cygwin.com/ . 2) Use either a snapshot version of gdb, a CVS version, or the version that comes with the 1.1.x version of gdb. GDB 5.0 probably won't work well on W2K. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com