Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: rschulz AT pop DOT teknowledge DOT com
Message-Id: <p04330100b6181c42dfea@[192.168.0.29]>
In-Reply-To: <200010220227.WAA07517@freenet10.carleton.ca>
References: <200010220227 DOT WAA07517 AT freenet10 DOT carleton DOT ca>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 21:26:47 -0700
To: bf250 AT freenet DOT carleton DOT ca, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: Randall R Schulz <rschulz AT teknowledge DOT com>
Subject: Re: newbie cygwin install
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
X-Return-Path: rschulz AT teknowledge DOT com

John,

I have no idea whether this is germane to your problems, but I was 
under the impression that Service Pack 3 for Windows NT 4 does not 
provide full year 2000 compatibility. Is it possible that there is a 
date-related issue with those packages that fail to install on your 
system?

Just a shot-in-the-dark guess....

Randall Schulz
Teknowledge Corp.
Palo Alto, CA USA


At 22:27 -0400 10/21/00, John Sankey wrote:
>I must be doing something totally dumb, but I've just downloaded
>cygwin 1.1.4 setup.exe and all the binaries separately (my phone line
>isn't reliable enough to use the on-line install), run setup,
>selected local directory. Setup refuses to install a whole lot of the
>downloaded things e.g. less (so man doesn't work) and tar (so I can't
>add anything) - it just offers the choice between Skip and N/A. (But,
>they are there - the same as the ones it will install.)
>
>I have NT4SP3.  All the directories seem to be installed OK, mount
>says things are mounted, and everything setup said it would install
>seems to be where it should be.
>
>BTW, I only want a system to load and use binaries (no development),
>but when I tried to run setup with only the "user" set of binaries,
>cygwin crashed with cygwin1.dll not found...
>
>No problem with <groan>'s - if you can just get me going :)



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com