Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 15:58:10 -0400
Message-Id: <200010201958.PAA20122@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
In-reply-to: <20001020141055.B14647@redhat.com> (message from Christopher
	Faylor on Fri, 20 Oct 2000 14:10:55 -0400)
Subject: Re: Cygwin SEGVs
References: <20001017120354 DOT A9810 AT cygnus DOT com> <20001017205249 DOT 7782 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20001020053504 DOT 5350 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20001020135305 DOT C14359 AT cygnus DOT com> <200010201803 DOT OAA19313 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20001020141055 DOT B14647 AT redhat DOT com>


> Actually, I don't think it was you, DJ.  I remember the discussion
> to use any output at all from a compilation as indication of an
> error.  I think that is what changed, wasn't it?  I thought that
> Alexandre Oliva made this change.
> 
> I know that you were trying valiantly to *fix* it, though.

Alexandre and I were working together to come up with a suitable fix
for the "big problem" (wrong things getting linked when building
cygwin), which is when the additional -B option got added.  It
triggered the gcc message.  I submitted the patch to get rid of the
gcc message; Jeff Law applied it.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com