Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <39EF6CF5.68E7B73E@veritas.com> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:51:49 -0700 From: Bob McGowan Organization: VERITAS Software X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin Subject: [Fwd: echo with sh.exe doesn't understand multiple parameters] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I managed a reply to the original poster only. For what its worth, here is my 2 cents worth ... Bob McGowan wrote: > > These are mutually exclusive options. The -n makes echo emulate the old Bourne shell behavior, -e the new. > > echo -n test > and > echo -e 'test\c' > > Are equivalent. The other backslash sequences recognized when -e is used had no equivalent in older shells. You had to embed litteral characters, where possible. > > Hope this helps. > > John Pollock wrote: > > > > With the echo command, using -n or -e alone with sh works fine: > > > > $ echo -e blah > > blah > > $ echo -n blah > > blah$ > > > > but when you try to use both flags at once, sh seems to get confused: > > > > blah$ echo -n -e blah > > -e blah$ > > > > Is there a workaround? > > > > John > > > > -- > > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > > -- > Bob McGowan > Staff Software Quality Engineer > VERITAS Software > rmcgowan AT veritas DOT com -- Bob McGowan Staff Software Quality Engineer VERITAS Software rmcgowan AT veritas DOT com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com