Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <39EEAB45.188EEFBD@dddandr.octacon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:05:25 +0100
From: Don Sharp <Don DOT Sharp AT dddandr DOT octacon DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: dwsharp AT iee DOT org
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gnuwin32 <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: Re: Why does ls report some directory dates as future?
References: <03F4742D8225D21191EF00805FE62B9904B3F579 AT aa-msg-01 DOT medstat DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20001018181145 DOT 0201aa10 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Setting aside the fact that the PATH would guarantee which ls was used,
the output from the other "ls" is shown below and agrees with the
version from cmd's "dir".

Has noone else noticed this behaviour?

Cheers

Don

$ /dosj/usr/local/bin/ls -lt
total 135
-rw-rw-rw-   1 0        0            3550 Oct 17 18:22 setup.log
-rw-rw-rw-   1 0        0           34578 Oct 17 18:22 setup.log.full
-rwxrwxrwx   1 0        0              48 Oct 17 18:22 cygwin.bat
-rw-rw-rw-   1 0        0             766 Oct 17 18:22 cygwin.ico
drwxrwxrwx   1 0        0               0 Oct 05 15:29 dosi
drwxrwxrwx   1 0        0               0 Oct 05 15:29 dosj
drwxrwxrwx   1 0        0               0 Oct 05 15:29 dosf
drwxrwxrwx   1 0        0               0 Oct 05 15:29 dosn
drwxrwxrwx   1 0        0               0 Oct 05 15:29 dosh
drwxrwxrwx   1 0        0               0 Oct 05 15:29 dosc
drwxrwxrwx   1 0        0               0 Oct 05 15:29 dosd
drwxrwxrwx   1 0        0               0 Oct 05 15:26 home
-rw-rw-rw-   1 0        0            4588 Sep 29 16:02
READMEopengl-1.1.0-2.txt
-rw-rw-rw-   1 0        0               0 Sep 29 14:24 d_context
drwxrwxrwx   1 0        0               0 Sep 26 20:22 tmp
drwxrwxrwx   1 0        0               0 Sep 26 20:22 var
drwxrwxrwx   1 0        0               0 Sep 26 20:22 lib
drwxrwxrwx   1 0        0               0 Sep 26 20:22 bin
drwxrwxrwx   1 0        0               0 Sep 26 17:32 etc
drwxrwxrwx   1 0        0               0 Sep 26 17:26 cygwin
drwxrwxrwx   1 0        0               0 Sep 26 17:06 RECYCLED
drwxrwxrwx   1 0        0               0 Sep 17 05:23 usr
-rw-rw-rw-   1 0        0           91395 Nov 27  1999 po-mode.el

"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
> 
> I notice you have many utilities that have copies in your j:\USR\LOCAL\BIN.
> Are you sure that you're invoking the Cygwin version of ls and not something
> else?
> 
> Larry
>

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com