Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:54:26 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: ps output format Message-ID: <20001018225426.B15652@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com References: <2443-Wed11Oct2000213946+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> <20001011164208 DOT A13281 AT cygnus DOT com> <5206-Wed18Oct2000223844+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i In-Reply-To: <5206-Wed18Oct2000223844+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>; from starksb@ebi.ac.uk on Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 10:38:43PM +0100 On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 10:38:43PM +0100, David Starks-Browning wrote: >On Wednesday 11 Oct 00, Chris Faylor writes: >> On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 09:39:46PM +0100, David Starks-Browning wrote: >> >Is there anything that can be done with ps output format before 1.1.5 >> >is released? >> >> Thanks for reminding me. I'll look into fixing this. It's actually using >> Windows 98 native pids now which are, of course, negative (?). > >I just installed the 2000-10-17 snapshot, and this looks a *lot* >better now. Thanks! > >Purists might not be happy with the alignment of column headers, >though: > >starksb AT STARKSB-P$ ps > PID PPID PGID WINPID TTY UID STIME COMMAND > 353411 1 353411 4294613885 0 500 21:56:14 /usr/local/BIN/RXVT > 661739 353411 661739 4294301261 1 500 21:56:16 /usr/bin/BASH > 662723 661739 662723 4294196185 1 500 21:56:22 /usr/local/BIN/RXVT > 783339 662723 783339 4294212997 2 500 21:56:23 /usr/bin/SSH > 589383 661739 589383 4294407093 1 500 22:31:32 /usr/bin/PS > 589383 661739 589383 4294407093 1 500 22:31:32 /usr/bin/PS > >But purists ought not to use Win98, eh? Ok, ok. I added a space or two to the output. Now Windows 9echs looks ok but Windows NT looks rather sparse. I suppose I could add a switch that shrinks the space for Windows NT. I'll probably wait until some purist complains about the excessive whitespace on NT, though. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com