Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <39EDBDF3.BE41FBD8@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 11:12:51 -0400 From: "Charles S. Wilson" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dehmel AT delorie DOT com, =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=FCdiger?= CC: "'Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)'" , "'cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com'" Subject: Re: cygwin gcc problem References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Yep, the cygwin gcc source (as seen in gcc-2.95.2-2-src.tar.gz) and the gcc source from gcc.gnu.org (checked out on 19991024) were different. I think there is work going on now to push the cygwin-specific changes from the cygwin-gcc into the official tree at gnu.org. Mumit's departure last May left a huge void, and only recently have a few folks stepped forward to partially fill his shoes. However, we shouldn't criticize Mumit for leaving; only appreciate him for his tremendous earlier contributions. --Chuck "Dehmel, Rüdiger" wrote: > > It looks like that there are differences between the > cygwin gcc 2.96.2 19991024 (release-2) > and the linux gcc 2.96.2 19991024 (release) > > 1. -fhuge-objects (see this thread) > 2. -MMD flag includes system headers on cygwin, but shoud not as on linux > > Who has ported gcc to cygwin? > > Ruediger > > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com