Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 21:29:11 -0400 From: Jasmin Patry To: Earnie Boyd Cc: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: distribution suggestion Message-ID: <20001016212909.E23805@cgl.uwaterloo.ca> References: <20001016230227 DOT 15174 DOT qmail AT web113 DOT yahoomail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001016230227.15174.qmail@web113.yahoomail.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 04:02:27PM -0700 On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 04:02:27PM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote: > Jasmin, > > I see that you would like to use MinGW to build tuxracer. Have you > accomplished this before? I.E. Does it work on WinNT 4 and not W2K? Which > were you using crtdll or msvcrt? I used the mingw32 cross-compiler (running under Linux), which I obtained from here: http://www.libsdl.org/Xmingw32/ Perhaps that version is out of date. The resulting executables worked fine under 98 (and NT, I think, though I didn't test that myself), but either crashed on startup, or intermittently (it seemed to vary with different builds of tuxracer) when run under w2k. I'm not sure which of crtdll or msvcrt I was using -- how can I tell? Earlier attempts to compile under Win2k using -mno-cygwin resulted in non-functional executables (they would bomb out right away with a status access violation or some such thing -- it's been a while so I don't remember). Given the problems that arise with distributing the Cygwin DLL, I'll renew my attempts at getting this to work. Thanks, Jasmin -- Jasmin Patry Lead Programmer, Tux Racer jfpatry AT sunspirestudios DOT com http://www.tuxracer.com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com