Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <018201c037ba$6eb62750$f7c723cb@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: "Jasmin Patry" Cc: , References: <003201c03752$74404970$f7c723cb AT lifelesswks> <20001016141212 DOT A5544 AT cgl DOT uwaterloo DOT ca> Subject: Re: distribution suggestion Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:45:30 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Oct 2000 21:40:41.0063 (UTC) FILETIME=[BAE82F70:01C037B9] Jasmin, I've cc'd my reply to the cygwin mailing list as I cannot give you a full answer (and I don't _recall_ seeing any mailing items that match to this on the list to date). Cygwiners: There's a neat little game "tuxracer" http://tuxracer.sourceforge.net . When I looked at it I found it uses cygwin1.dll & glut.. however they distibute cygwin1.dll (which gives rise to our favourite conflict). I suggested packaging cygwin1.dll separately as the runtime will run against newer cygwin1.dll's, and users who need it can download it, but this obviously needs user knowledge of whats going on :-]--- Is there a good answer to Jasmin's question below? Rob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jasmin Patry" To: "Robert Collins" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 5:12 AM Subject: Re: distribution suggestion > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 08:21:22PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > > Hi, > > I notice you use cygwin1.dll as a support library for tuxracer. > > > > All windows users that have cygwin1.dll in memory will find tuxracer doesn't > > work, or stackdumps unless their copy of cygwin1.dll is the same build as > > yours. The solution is to move or rename the cygwin1.dll from your > > distribution. > > Thanks a lot for pointing this out. We'd prefer to use mingw32 to > compile Tux Racer (hence no cygwin1.dll), but unfortunately the > resulting executable doesn't run under Windows 2000. > > Do you know if renaming cygwin1.dll to something else will work (after > re-linking tuxracer against that new dll, of course)? Or will it still > try to use the same shared memory segments as before, resulting in the > same problem? > > Thanks, > Jasmin > > -- > Jasmin Patry Lead Programmer, Tux Racer > jfpatry AT sunspirestudios DOT com http://www.tuxracer.com > -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com