Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <39E82575.1B8701A9@cygnus.com> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 11:20:53 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen Reply-To: cygwin X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-SMP i686) X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: RFC: linux compatibility References: <200010132129 DOT RAA22588 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <000c01c03560$d1dfede0$1d01a8c0 AT BRAEMARINC DOT COM> <20001013204631 DOT B3048 AT cygnus DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:59:11PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > >What about the "Single Unix Specification" at Opengroup > > I actually have been using the documents at this site as the basis for > most of the work I do for Cygwin. > > When they don't mention a feature, I usually use Linux. Unfortunately, > it's not Red Hat linux, specifically. Instead it is the cgf linux > distribution (tm) that I've built up over the years. That's my favorite order. SUS first, Linux if something is missing in SUS and as last resort Commodore 64. Uh, oh, forget the last one... Corinna -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com