Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <20001013211422.6698.qmail@web122.yahoomail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:14:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Earnie Boyd Subject: Re: RFC: linux compatibility To: tiberius AT braemarinc DOT com, "Cygwin Mailing List \(E-mail\)" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- "Gary R. Van Sickle" wrote: > As a user, it seems to me that this should be how the priorities work out: > > 1. POSIX compliant, if for no other reason than it's the right thing to do. > 2. "GNU compliant", by which I mean essentially that anything that links > and runs with glibc should work with Cygwin. > 3. "Other-Unii compatible", meaning that aything that can be added to the > Cygwin mix that doesn't violate the above and yet allows it to be more > compatible with other distributions should be added. > > I don't see "which Unix do we emulate?" as a sensible question. Cygwin is > intended to be 'Unix on Windows', not 'Linux on Windows' or 'BSD on Windows' > or 'Solaris on Windows'. > > Isn't it? > Well, isn't Linux intended to be Unix for the PC? I think the discussion is about standards and DJ is asking if Linux should be the standard to follow. I believe that Linux is both POSIX and GNU compliant which covers your 1 and 2 numbered points. As for number 3, that's a different question, although I agree that if it adds to portability then it might be considered. Cheers, ===== Earnie Boyd mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com --- --- --- Cygwin: POSIX on Windows --- --- Minimalist GNU for Windows --- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com