Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <39E62E50.8E2182F9@veritas.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 14:34:08 -0700
From: Bob McGowan <rmcgowan AT veritas DOT com>
Organization: VERITAS Software
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
CC: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: Re: registry key values question
References: <39E61B8C DOT 277634E2 AT veritas DOT com> <200010122019 DOT QAA21289 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks, DJ.  But, interestingly, these are showing up on machines that have never had anything except ver. 1.1.4 installed (I believe).  I have mixed some of the CD (ver
1.0) stuff (contrib, specifically), but nohting earlier that I know of.

DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > Is there any significance to this key being there?
> 
> It's from the pre-1.0 cygwin (B19 etc), which stored mounts in a
> completely different location.  Seeing such keys only means that the
> machine once had B19 or so installed.  They can safely be deleted if
> you no longer have older cygwins installed.

-- 
Bob McGowan
Staff Software Quality Engineer
VERITAS Software
rmcgowan AT veritas DOT com

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com