Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20001010144523.021e6308@pop.ma.ultranet.com> X-Sender: lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:46:46 -0400 To: John Beardmore , cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" Subject: Re: Alpha CPU In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 01:53 PM 10/10/2000, John Beardmore wrote: >Has cygwin been ported to run under NT 4 on the Alpha processors ? Check the email archives on this. Someone did some work on this a while ago but I'm not sure what the state is now. >If not, what would I need to do a port ? The Cygwin source!;-) See sources.redhat.com/cygwin. >I've been given a couple of 2100 servers and was thinking of running >Linux on them, but it sounds as if Linux isn't rock solid with multiple >processors under Sable architecture. > >I'm wondering if I might get best use of these boxes by leaving NT in >place as an abstraction layer to use both CPUs, while giving me an >environment that can run most Linux apps ? > >To what extent does the cygwin dll offer a unix kernel style api ? I >assume Linux executables can't be persuaded to run under cygwin without >some recompilation ? Correct. >Cheers, J/. >-- >John Beardmore Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com