Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D7602CDC6@wilber.adroit.com>
From: "Robinow, David" <drobinow AT dayton DOT adroit DOT com>
To: "'cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com'" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject: RE: Two snapshot bugs
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:37:27 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

> So 'getcwd (NULL, -1)' should return something but 'getcwd 
> (NULL, 0)', IMO,
> should not.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
int main()
{
   char *dir = getcwd(NULL, 0);
   perror("Error =");
   printf("getcwd=%s\n", dir);

}
 Sets EINVAL in Irix.
 Sets EINVAL in SunOS 5.6
 Looks like "getcwd" returns the right thing.  Should errno be set?

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com