Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <001a01c03210$56b964f0$cd8a9dc0@uk.aonix.com> From: "Cliff Hones" To: Cc: Subject: Two queries - flex, and no-cygwin linking with msvcrt.dll Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 17:45:31 +0100 Organization: Aonix Europe Ltd. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 I have two unconnected queries: The version of flex currently distributed with Cygwin identifies itself as Cygnus version 2.5-cygwin-990830, but appears to have been built from sources pre-dating the current flex source which is version 2.5.4a, dated September 1996. When I try to use flex during a build of bochs (the x86 simulator) I have problems with the Cygwin version, while if I rebuild flex (under Cygwin) from the 2.5.4a sources all is well. Is there any reason why the Cygwin binary version is out of date? Is it possible to link with msvcrt.dll (rather than crtsdll.dll) when using -mno-cygwin? I see there is a libmsvcrt.a included in the cygwin mingw distribution, but the crt1.o startup requires crtdll.dll, and I am wary of linking an application including parts from both. The gcc-2.95.2-mingw-extra distibution only includes the crtdll.dll version, and the mingw runtime source distribution (source-2000-03-27.zip) seems to only build the crtdll flavour for cygwin. Is there a good reason for this, or could the mingw runtime makefile be extended in the 'obvious' way to build a msvcrt version? -- Cliff Hones Aonix Europe Ltd. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com