Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <20001006191433.5631.qmail@web106.yahoomail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:14:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com> Subject: Re: make[5]: execvp: C:/Cygwin/bin/bash.exe: No more processes To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 10:14:29AM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote: > >--- Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> wrote: > >> > >> That's a shame. It's likely that there will be problems in the next > release > >> if no one tests the snapshots. > >> > > > >And a lot of work has been done to improve Cygwin. I'm currently using a > the > >most recent snapshots with no problem. It also feels faster, I can display > a > >colorized long listing of the /usr/bin directory upon a fresh start of > Cygwin > >in ~3.6 seconds with the process getting only 10 - 11 percent of the CPU. > Due > >to some brilliant path caching a subsequent issue of the same command will > >finish in ~1.8 seconds. > > It would be interesting to see if you notice any speed improvements by > mounting > any directory containing cygwin executables with the '-X' option. This > informs > the cygwin1.dll v1.1.5 that it can pass arguments around using UNIX > conventions > for argv and the environment. So, it doesn't have to spend time quoting > arguments > or munging environment variables. > Interesting. ~1.6 seconds initial ~1.8 - ~2.1 seconds subsequent. I then tried other directories and those than didn't contain symlinks were equal in timing with initial and subsequent. I have some directories that contain only symlinks and the difference between initial and subsequent is roughly 2 to 1. > For directories containing non-cygwin executables, mounting using the '-x' > option > should also cause a slight increase. That would stop cygwin from opening > file > to look for a '#!' in the case of non .exe files. This is also the case for > '-X' > mounted directories, of course. > > The '-x' option actually should work for 1.1.4, too. > > Also, check out the 'ps -W' command. It lists all processes rather than just > Cygwin processes. > Nice. It's obvious which are and which aren't Cygwin processes. Now, if I could only use the kill command on the Non-Cygwin process. > Now, if only it all worked on NT 3.5... :-( > It did once upon a time. ;) Cheers, ===== Earnie Boyd mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com --- <http://earniesystems.safeshopper.com> --- --- Cygwin: POSIX on Windows <http://gw32.freeyellow.com/> --- --- Minimalist GNU for Windows <http://www.mingw.org/> --- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free! http://photos.yahoo.com/ -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com