Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <17B78BDF120BD411B70100500422FC6309E11C@IIS000>
From: Bernard Dautrevaux <Dautrevaux AT microprocess DOT com>
To: "'cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com'" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject: RE: make[5]: execvp: C:/Cygwin/bin/bash.exe: No more processes
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:19:00 +0200 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Faylor [mailto:cgf AT cygnus DOT com]
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 6:39 PM
> To: 'cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com'
> Subject: Re: make[5]: execvp: C:/Cygwin/bin/bash.exe: No more 
> processes
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 04:21:39PM +0200, Bernard Dautrevaux wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Chris Faylor [mailto:cgf AT cygnus DOT com]
> >> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 2:47 AM
> >> To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
> >> Subject: Re: make[5]: execvp: C:/Cygwin/bin/bash.exe: No more 
> >> processes
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 08:40:10PM -0400, Guy T. Moore Jr. wrote:
> >> >Cygwin'ers:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >I've somewhat narrowed down a make error based on the level
> >> >of nested makes but using our build system the way it is.
> >> >i.e.: I cannot prove that my error is only related to the
> >> >      number of nested makes.
> >> >
> >> >So I guess this is stack related or some other resource that
> >> >I would like to bump up.
> >> >
> >> >What resource is my error related to, and can I bump it up
> >> >using what command?
> >> 
> >> Since the only message you're getting is "no more processes", I
> >> would guess that it may be accurate.  How about adding a 'ps -ef'
> >> to each recursion, to verify.
> >> 
> >> cygwin 1.1.4 only allows a limited number of processes.  
> I've removed
> >> this limitation in the snapshots.  Now you can have as 
> many processes
> >> as Windows allows.
> >
> >Sorry, this is the answer to my preceding e-mail... should 
> have read th
> >ewhole thread (my own excuse is that outlook had split the 
> thread for some
> >mysterious reason...)
> >
> >> 
> >> So, two things:  1) try adding the 'ps', and 2) try a snapshot.
> >> 
> >
> >Thanks; however I'll probably wait for the next cygwin release :-)
> 
> That's a shame.  It's likely that there will be problems in 
> the next release
> if no one tests the snapshots.

Excuse me: I was wanting to say: "I'll probably wait for the next cygwin
release before updating the production systems", not before testing if this
work :-)

Thanks for the good work,

	Bernard

--------------------------------------------
Bernard Dautrevaux
Microprocess Ingenierie
97 bis, rue de Colombes
92400 COURBEVOIE
FRANCE
Tel:	+33 (0) 1 47 68 80 80
Fax:	+33 (0) 1 47 88 97 85
e-mail:	dautrevaux AT microprocess DOT com
		b DOT dautrevaux AT usa DOT net
-------------------------------------------- 

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com