Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <031001c02f05$f3c52760$e98906d5@default>
From: "Andreas Eibach" <a DOT eibach AT gmx DOT net>
To: "Earnie Boyd" <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Cc: <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
References: <20001005204454 DOT 17469 DOT qmail AT web110 DOT yahoomail DOT com>
Subject: Re: -mno-cygwin question
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 21:53:36 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400


> Well if there wasn't a reason to have Cygwin then that wouldn't have been
> invented either.  You've taken my question out of context, read the rest
of the
> thread.  The poster is trying to use -mno-cygwin when s/he needs Cygwin or
i.e.
> POSIX.

Alright :)
Well I really was thinking for a moment you meant it like "Do you think
non-Cygwin
exec's are necessary at all"? This made me a little curious. :)

Sorry for the noise,
 Andreas


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com