Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <031001c02f05$f3c52760$e98906d5@default> From: "Andreas Eibach" To: "Earnie Boyd" Cc: References: <20001005204454 DOT 17469 DOT qmail AT web110 DOT yahoomail DOT com> Subject: Re: -mno-cygwin question Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 21:53:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 > Well if there wasn't a reason to have Cygwin then that wouldn't have been > invented either. You've taken my question out of context, read the rest of the > thread. The poster is trying to use -mno-cygwin when s/he needs Cygwin or i.e. > POSIX. Alright :) Well I really was thinking for a moment you meant it like "Do you think non-Cygwin exec's are necessary at all"? This made me a little curious. :) Sorry for the noise, Andreas -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com