Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: From: "Masterson, Dave" To: "'Earnie Boyd'" Cc: "'cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com'" Subject: RE: /etc/profile in BASH Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 11:28:53 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Doh! You're right! Memory is the second thing to go as you get older... However, I still don't think these two lines to run ~/.profile and ~/.bashrc belong in /etc/profile (neither does "cd $HOME"). They subvert the "--noprofile" and "--norc" options to BASH. -----Original Message----- From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com] Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 11:26 AM To: Masterson, Dave; 'cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com' Subject: RE: /etc/profile in BASH --- "Masterson, Dave" wrote: > I didn't realize that a login BASH doesn't execute ~/.bashrc. Be that as it > may, I think it should be the decision of ~/.bash_profile (or ~/.profile) > whether to execute ~/.bashrc -- *NOT* /etc/profile. Putting this into > /etc/profile makes it too BASH-centric. What about the [T]CSH users? Also, > what about ~/.bash_login files (as described in the MAN page)? > IIRC [t]csh doesn't user /etc/profile. Use the source, Luke. (tm) Cheers, ===== Earnie Boyd mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com --- --- --- Cygwin: POSIX on Windows --- --- Minimalist GNU for Windows --- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free! http://photos.yahoo.com/ -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com