Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <17B78BDF120BD411B70100500422FC6309E0FE@IIS000> From: Bernard Dautrevaux To: "'cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com'" , cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: RE: Setting cygdrive prefix to '/' causes disappearing mounts Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 14:07:08 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Faylor [mailto:cgf AT cygnus DOT com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 1:21 PM > To: 'cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com'; cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > Subject: Re: Setting cygdrive prefix to '/' causes disappearing mounts > > > Did you actually look at the patch or are you just speculating? I'm mainly speculating on how I would understand changing "/cygdrive" by "/": I've always expected this to suppress "cygdrive", thus changing "/cygdrive/a" in "//a"; I've probably read too fast when I'll see somewhere that we can get the old, B20, behaviour, assuming it was by setting the cygpath prefix to "/" instead of "/cygdrive". So IIUC it's no more possible to get a: mounted on //a only (as it seems that /cygdrive/a is still accessible as //a, or is it due to some quirk I've done and don't remember?) > > I don't know what "matching code" you are referring to but > the patch is > correct. Cygwin used to umount any directory that was a > subdirectory of > a cygdrive path. Now it doesn't. What I've said is that, from a user point of view, to get a: mounted as /a, I would have expected setting the cygdrive prefix to the empty string, while setting it to "/" would have mounted a: as //a; I agree its acceptable to mount it as "/a" when the prefix is "/", but it's counter-intuitive and I think a some people may get fooled by this (as I was). > > However, if you think that something is wrong with the patch, I'm sure > that both Kazuhiro and I would both love to see a correction. For me the patch is OK: being able to explicitely mount things under /cygdrive (or whatever it's named) is OK; there was just a misunderstanding on what exactly was the cygdrive prefix... Bernard -------------------------------------------- Bernard Dautrevaux Microprocess Ingenierie 97 bis, rue de Colombes 92400 COURBEVOIE FRANCE Tel: +33 (0) 1 47 68 80 80 Fax: +33 (0) 1 47 88 97 85 e-mail: dautrevaux AT microprocess DOT com b DOT dautrevaux AT usa DOT net -------------------------------------------- -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com