Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 07:15:09 -0400 To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: Link "bash" to "ksh" to be more "portable"? Message-ID: <20000919071509.C27571@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <39C7148F DOT EAE9F548 AT cern DOT ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i In-Reply-To: <39C7148F.EAE9F548@cern.ch>; from lassi.tuura@cern.ch on Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:23:59AM +0200 On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:23:59AM +0200, Lassi A. Tuura wrote: >> Is it reasonable to link "bash.exe" to "ksh.exe" in the Cygwin >> distribution? Is there any feature in Korn shell that is NOT in Bash, >> or any other reason why this might be a bad thing to do? > >IIRC, zsh has a mode to emulate ksh, and will do so automatically if it >starts as "ksh"-named process. There have been messages about porting >zsh to cygwin on this list, so take a look around to see if you can find >the port. Then create a symlink ksh to zsh or just copy the program to >ksh. Haven't tried that though. Why not just use pdksh? I'd have more confidence that something with "ksh" in its name would emulate ksh more precisely. I don't know if anyone has ported it, but I wouldn't be surprised. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com