Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 21:26:53 -0400 To: "'cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com'" Subject: Re: Setup, Cygwin or tar problem Message-ID: <20000914212653.B28581@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Mail-Followup-To: "'cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com'" References: <896908DA55C4D311B9C000C04F01A05406F94B AT ENTERPRISE> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i In-Reply-To: <896908DA55C4D311B9C000C04F01A05406F94B@ENTERPRISE>; from Harold@compasstechnologies.com on Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 09:18:03PM -0400 On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 09:18:03PM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote: >Did you reinstall so recently that it was after my patch was applied? No. I just updated today and tried it again, though, to test another installation problem, though, and saw that your patch had been applied. >Furthermore, since you work at Cygnus, with DJ, I am assuming that you >are using Samba 2.05, as DJ said he tested setup with that version and >it worked fine; so, the bug may never present itself to you. That's >just my counter-point to your counter-point, I am using Samba 2.07. DJ works in New Hampshire and I work in Massachusetts. Corinna works in Germany. We all have different setups, which is a good thing. Regardless, this was just an observation about Earnie's problem. Earnie was positing that there was a problem reinstalling over an old installation. I was just saying that I'd done just that with no ill effects. I mentioned that I was testing samba installation only as a passing data point. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com