Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 13:40:37 +0100 Message-ID: <8312-Thu14Sep2000134037+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk> X-Mailer: emacs 20.7.1 (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I); VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.1 From: David Starks-Browning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: chmod does not work as expected In-Reply-To: <20000902222215.C13854@cygnus.com> References: <20000902230156 DOT CHCZ24872 DOT mta01 DOT onebox DOT com AT onebox DOT com> <20000902222215 DOT C13854 AT cygnus DOT com> Some time ago Chris wrote to me requesting a FAQ entry: On Saturday 2 Sep 00, Chris Faylor writes: > FAQ alert. > > We need something that discusses why "chmod doesn't work" along with > some discussion of ntsec and ntea. Along with this "answer": > ntsec will allow UNIX perms on Windows NT on NTFS file systems. > > ntea works on NTFS and FAT but it creates a huge (undeletable) file on > FAT filesystems. > > There is no solution at all for Windows 9x. Is this enough? Does this answer the question completely? If not, could someone contribute a more thorough explanation? I don't use ntsec myself, so I don't know what the issues or limitations are. Thanks for your help. Cheers, David -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com