Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 22:37:28 -0400
Message-Id: <200009060237.WAA09310@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com
CC: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
In-reply-to: <20000906023148.4901.qmail@web108.yahoomail.com> (message from
	Earnie Boyd on Tue, 5 Sep 2000 19:31:48 -0700 (PDT))
Subject: Re: versions/compatibilities FAQ request
References:  <20000906023148 DOT 4901 DOT qmail AT web108 DOT yahoomail DOT com>


> Why denote the version on the shortcut?  Why not just Cygwin?  And
> don't tell me to look at the DLL naming thread. ;^)

The Cygwin CD-ROM called itself "Cygwin 1.0" in the start menu so I
wanted to put something else to differentiate it.  Perhaps "Cygwin Net
Release"?

Within Red Hat we often need multiple versions of Cygwin installed for
various purposes.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com