Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Reply-To: <nhv AT cape DOT com>
From: "Norman Vine" <nhv AT cape DOT com>
To: "'Jonas Jensen'" <bones0_list AT hotmail DOT com>
Cc: <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject: RE: printf is faster when piped through tee
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 16:21:45 -0400
Message-ID: <000301c0151b$6f3023a0$f536ba8c@nhv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26
In-Reply-To: <OE45q6DqaJY4kJSFsxf00000768@hotmail.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Importance: Normal

Jonas Jensen writes:
>
>> >Something's wrong with the performance of printf. When compiling with
>> >gcc, printf executes much slower than with Microsoft's "cl". The funny
>> >thing is that when I pipe those programs through "tee", they're both
>> >(equally) fast.
>>
>
>Did you do this on purpose or something? It seems a bit weird that a write
>takes _excactly_ 1/100th of a second, both on my GeForce-powered desktop
>comp. and my weak laptop...
>

Hint -
you might want to perform your test using this terminal or something similar
http://www.io.com/~bub/rxvt.html
instead of the console device.

Norman


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com