Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 15:42:42 -0400 To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: DLL naming conventions Message-ID: <20000831154242.B7880@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com References: <20000831194146 DOT 867 DOT qmail AT web120 DOT yahoomail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i In-Reply-To: <20000831194146.867.qmail@web120.yahoomail.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 12:41:46PM -0700 On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 12:41:46PM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote: >--- Chris Faylor wrote: >> >> That means that the (so far hypothetical) DLL problems should be >> solvable by keeping the DLLs in the same directory as the executables. >> > >Great news! So my earlier suggestion stands to good effect. Unofficial Cygwin >packages should install in --prefix=/usr/local/packages.x.x.x. Official Cygwin >packages should install in --prefix=/usr. No need to prefix, suffix or munge >the names. > >Done, (Chris and Earnie shake hands and go about their business...) (Other people not quite so satisified...) cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com