Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:24:22 -0400 To: Cygwin List Subject: Re: Why not mount / at C: ? Message-ID: <20000830102422.B25880@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin List References: <20000824115435 DOT 26205 DOT qmail AT web108 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <200008241243 DOT OAA00184 AT dphdse DOT saclay DOT cea DOT fr> <716-Thu24Aug2000153328+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> <39AD014D DOT 5A60EA03 AT home DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i In-Reply-To: <39AD014D.5A60EA03@home.com>; from superbiskit@home.com on Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 08:42:53AM -0400 On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 08:42:53AM -0400, David A. Cobb wrote: >David Starks-Browning wrote: >>On Thursday 24 Aug 00, Jean-Paul Le Fevre writes: >>>Could you confirm that it is just a simple "recommendation" ? >>> >>>The FAQ states : "You are strongly urged not to choose something like >>>'C:\'." >> >>As I recall, there had been genuine bugs with certain things not >>working when the Cygwin root was C:\. I believe those are now fixed, >>so perhaps we don't need to word it so strongly. > >They weren't fixed two weeks ago, believe me! Um. Details? As far as I know, they *are* fixed. Believe me! cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com