Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 17:27:30 +0400 From: Egor Duda X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.41) Reply-To: Egor Duda Organization: DEO X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <0727.000824@logos-m.ru> To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: Why not mount / at C: ? In-reply-To: <20000824115435.26205.qmail@web108.yahoomail.com> References: <20000824115435 DOT 26205 DOT qmail AT web108 DOT yahoomail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! Thursday, 24 August, 2000 Earnie Boyd earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com wrote: EB> I'm beginning to think that it would be best to not support unmounted drives in EB> the Cygwin environment. It gets far to confusing and there are solutions EB> around not having the support. Saying this, IMO, we should deprecate the EB> unmounted drives support. What do you think? you can confuse things much more. now, every win32 path can be converted to posix form, and this is very useful feature. when program call getcwd(), for example, it assumeses that posix layer will return correct posix-style path, and have all rights to. Egor. mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19 -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com