Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <02a801c005c5$246e04a0$0100000a@TIMYX18EWDT6RQ> From: "Tim Prince" To: References: <20000810162453 DOT B11273 AT cygnus DOT com> <20000811113927 DOT E19565 AT cygnus DOT com> Subject: Re: makeinfo not built to run under win32 ? Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 00:56:22 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.5600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.5600 AFAIK the texinfo part of gcc is not intended to be maintained, rather will be removed from that distribution, so it seems logical enough to remove it ourselves when we already have a satisfactory makeinfo incorporated in cygwin. Yes, Mumit did a great deal of the work to include cygwin with secondary support or whatever they call it in gcc, but that doesn't extend to the texinfo part of gcc, which we don't need. Tim Prince ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Faylor" To: Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 8:39 AM Subject: Re: makeinfo not built to run under win32 ? > On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 10:46:14AM -0400, Chuck Meade wrote: > >When you say that the version on sources has a lot of extra > >patches, do you mean the version of makeinfo in cygwin, or the > >makeinfo source in gcc? > > I mean the gcc sources. Mumit Khan did a lot of work on gcc itself. > > cgf > > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com