Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Apparently-From: Reply-To: From: "Chuck Meade" To: Subject: RE: makeinfo not built to run under win32 ? Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:46:14 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20000810162453.B11273@cygnus.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Importance: Normal Chris, There is not a "makeinfo.exe" in the gcc distribution (like you said), but one is built when building gcc *under* cygwin. Building gcc under cygwin produces a makeinfo.exe in your gcc build area that is not able to run in a cygwin environment, even though the makeinfo.exe that comes with cygwin runs properly. I looked at the source file makeinfo.c that is supplied with gcc and ran some quick tests. Function find_and_load is failing because WIN32 is not defined when makeinfo is built. Is the fact that WIN32 is not defined during this build a problem with cygwin, or with gcc? When you say that the version on sources has a lot of extra patches, do you mean the version of makeinfo in cygwin, or the makeinfo source in gcc? Thanks a lot, Chuck > >Thanks for the reply. You started me looking in the right places. > >I was not aware that there is a makeinfo.exe in the gcc-2.95.2 > >release as well as the one in cygwin's texinfo.tar.gz. The makeinfo > >from gcc is the one that fails, and the one in cygwin works. > >Here's what I found, which is basically exactly what you said: > > FYI, there is no 'makeinfo.exe' in the gcc release on sources.redhat.com. > > I assume that you are building your own version. The version on sources > has *a lot* of extra patches from Mumit Khan so be advised that the > two are not equivalent. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com