Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <39921CA4.B43C1565@pacbell.net> Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2000 20:08:20 -0700 From: Jay Bromley X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en,es-MX MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: gdb-5.0 disassembler output in console window Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, I seem to have come across a problem with disassembler output in the latest gdb (I updated my cygwin today, 8/9.) The problem is that if I open a console window while using Insight and then at some later point in program execution try to get a disassembly what I get is a list of addresses without any assembly code. I tried the same thing using "gdb -nw theprogram.exe" and disassemble yields a list of addresses which is then followed by the assembler source code smushed together on a few lines. Below is an example of what happens. (gdb) disass Dump of assembler code for function add_subscription__Q27TestMkt6TradedPQ27TestM kt8TestSubs: 0x410e7c : 0x410e7d : 0x410e7f : 0x410e85 : 0x410e86 : 0x410e87 : 0x410e88 : 0x410e8d : 0x410e8f : 0x410e91 : 0x410e93 : 0x410e99 : 0x410e9c : 0x410e9f : 0x410ea4 : 0x410ea5 : 0x410ea8 : 0x410ea9 : 0x410eae : 0x410eb1 : 0x410eb7 : push %ebpmov %esp,%ebpsub $0xfc,%esppush %edipush %esipush %ebxcal l 0x4dbfb4 <__get_eh_context>mov %eax,%eaxmov %eax,%edxmov %edx,%eaxm ov %eax,0xffffff1c(%ebp)add $0xfffffff8,%espmov 0x8(%ebp),%eaxadd $0 xcc,%eaxpush %eaxlea 0xfffffff0(%ebp),%eaxpush %eaxcall 0x501d14 <__Q26 MWUtil9WriteLockPQ26MWUtil4Lock>add $0x10,%espmov 0xffffff1c(%ebp),%edxadd $0x4,%edx---Type to continue, or q to quit--- q Quit It seems something is tweaked in the display loop and this causes the Insight gdb console to spit out the plain addresses. So the question is is this a known bug, a new bug, or is my gdb just tweaked? If a new bug a pointer to the code to check out to fix this would be handy. Thanks and regards, Jay Bromley -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com