Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <39899040.962E83C4@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2000 11:31:12 -0400 From: Charles Wilson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: d DOT l DOT whiteley AT ee DOT leeds DOT ac DOT uk CC: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: Horrid Configuration - more data. Help Please References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Perhaps you've already considered this, and I feel...disloyal...mentioning it, but it's possible Cygwin is not the right platform for your purposes. What about mingw + a suite of natively-compiled unix-like tools? It's been my experience that you almost *have* to use a unix shell (bash, tcsh, zsh, etc) with cygwin tools, or weird problems crop up. It's *possible* to run everything from command.com, but awkward and will probably cause more problems for your windows-addicted associates and students than it solves, IMO. Check out mingw: http://www.mingw.org/ I can't recommend this suite of tools, 'cause the guy is violating the GPL -- but if enough people pester him maybe he'll put the source code up on his site: http://www.weihenstephan.de/~syring/win32/UnxUtils.html There are other alternatives that comply with the GPL, however: http://virtunix.itribe.net/ --Chuck Dave Whiteley wrote: > > As stated in another message.... but now more details. > > We have a lab full of PCs, all with secured desk tops, running NT. We > can do some configuration, but not all, as we do not administer the > usernames used on these machines. We can set some environmental > variables and map some drives when "our" students log on. > > I want the students to be able to use xemacs to edit, and gcc to > compile C and C++ code. The students "should" have experienced using > the DOS command prompt, but will not have encountered Bash, and we > will not have time to teach it, and unix directory structure to them > (not to mention friction from Windows addict collegues). > > (I also want access to the other utilities so that I do not curse > and swear when I type ls not DIR, cat not TYPE and so on) > > So, I need to set the system up to run gcc etc. from the NT/Dos > command prompt. > > We have already set up the path, and gcc, ls et. al. runs. What is > failing is that gcc does not find include files (and probably lib > files, but we have not got that far yet.) > > All the recent Cygwin documentation I have found assumes use under > Bash where the unix like file system solves these problems. > > Also, if we run xemacs from an icon, and then compile from within > that, I assume xemacs will inherit the "default" environment, and > then gcc will inherit that. (Please correct me if I am wrong.) > > We cannot ask the first time users to type in a long command with all > the flags and options, so we need to set up the defaults (probably via > environmental variables). > > I have looked at some gcc documentation, but it assumes unix directory > structures. > > (I remember the useful envvar "DJGPP" that solved this problem for us > before NT.) > > Thanks, > Dave Whiteley > > ---------------------------------- > E-Mail: Dave Whiteley > Date: 03-Aug-2000 > Time: 15:25:20 > > This message has been disinfected. > It does not contain the Linux .sig virus. > ---------------------------------- > > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com