Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000802125656.0170ca08@pop.ne.mediaone.net> X-Sender: jmaltz AT pop DOT ne DOT mediaone DOT net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 12:56:56 -0400 To: cygwin From: Jon Maltz Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] OpenSSH-2.1.1p4 for Cygwin 1.1.3 In-Reply-To: <39884671.9D9BE947@cygnus.com> References: <200008020035 DOT UAA19954 AT rtl DOT cygnus DOT com> <39882CBF DOT B7C9C0F5 AT bigfoot DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" The RSA patent expires September 21st, expect to see many encryption programs relying on RSAREF to have new versions out around September 22nd. Export restrictions for encryption software that doesn't require a license payment seem to be gone, at the moment away -- http://www.bxa.doc.gov/Encryption/qanda.htm Note the crystal clear language used in this document. Case in point, redhat distributes OpenSSH and OpenSSL RPMs on ftp.redhat.com ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/contrib/libc6/SRPMS/openssh-2.1.1p1-1.src.rpm ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/contrib/libc6/i386/openssl-0.9.5a-1.i386.rpm The web pages for those packages don't indicate if they use full RSA or RSAREF, and I suppose it's possible that redhat got a license for the RSA patent at some point in the past that might make that question moot. As it stands, since Corinna's version uses full RSA, it can't be downloaded by anyone in the USA without violating the RSA patent for the next seven weeks. After the patent expires, I'm not sure there would be anything preventing it from being hosted on a site in the US, until of course the next random encryption policy change. Jon I can only assume, not being a linux user myself, that this version of At 06:04 PM 8/2/2000 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote something like this: >James Dumser wrote: >> Am I misremembering or is there >> another reason your publishing on ftp.franken.de? > >Crypto export restriction, RSA patent etc. >OpenSSH will be released on sources.redhat.com perhaps next year. > >> >From your README: >> > - If you are installing OpenSSH the first time, you can generate >> > server keys and your own user keys by running >> > >> > /usr/local/bin/ssh-config >> >> Actually, it's not the first time; but it wasn't working before. I >> removed /usr/local/etc/ssh_host* files, renamed my ~/.ssh, and ran >> ssh-config. BTW, it would be nice if ssh-config created ~/.ssh if it >> didn't exist. > >ssh-keygen creates .ssh by itself. > >> inetd runs as the SYSTEM account. Your note (and my knowledge of NT) is >> not clear if SYSTEM already has the necessary permissions or not. I > >SYSTEM has all necessary rights. I thought this would be clear. > >> When I try to ssh to itself, I get >> debug: ssh_exchange_identification: sshd: no hostkeys available -- >> exiting. > >From the sources I can see exactliy three possible reasons: >- v1.X protocol: Problem with rsa. >- v1.X protocol: No ssh_host_key file. >- v2 protocol: No ssh_dsa_host_key file. > >Try `sshd -d' from the command line. This might give you a hint. > >Corinna > >-- >Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to >Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com >Red Hat, Inc. >mailto:vinschen AT cygnus DOT com > >-- >Want to unsubscribe from this list? >Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > > -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com