Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 21:26:02 -0400
Message-Id: <200008020126.VAA30570@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: pgarceau AT teleport DOT com
CC: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
In-reply-to: <39871530.13263.132FCC9@localhost> (pgarceau@teleport.com)
Subject: Re: _argc & _argv
References: <39870B67 DOT 4472 DOT 10CC499 AT localhost>; from pgarceau AT teleport DOT com on Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 05:39:51PM -0800 <39871530 DOT 13263 DOT 132FCC9 AT localhost>


> 	More specifically, is argc, argv defined with or w/o leading 
> underscores for Cygwin when it comes to defining them for a 
> main() routine?
> 
>    csMain (argc, argv); (Cygwin?)

They're parameter names.  You can call them anything you want.  You
could call them "quagmire" and "felicity" if you want.


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com