Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: Problem with system() X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3 (Intl) 21 March 2000 From: Glenn DOT Davis AT predictive DOT com Message-ID: Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 11:04:22 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Apollo/Predictive(Release 5.0.4 |June 8, 2000) at 07/27/2000 11:04:24 AM, Serialize complete at 07/27/2000 11:04:24 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Chris Faylor 07/27/00 09:48 AM Please respond to cygwin To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com cc: Glenn DOT Davis AT predictive DOT com Subject: Re: Problem with system() >On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 09:42:19AM -0400, Glenn DOT Davis AT predictive DOT com wrote: >>Chris, >>I guesss I should have given more info. >>I tried >> system ("command /c dir") >>and yes, I am using Windows 95. > >I don't know what's wrong but I would check basic things like your PATH. >If you don't have a command.com in your path then system is obviously >not going to be able to run "command". I know I don't sound like I know what I am doing, but I did look at my Path. I am able to run commands from inside bash. I even put the full path of the commands in the system call. I still get the same results. >>In fact I tried a whole bunch of commands that are cygwin commands. >>Whatever I do, the system call returns a 127. > >"File not found". thanks. > >>I couldn't find what a 127 meant, if anything. >>Anyway, is it possible that I can be missing a dll. Or is there only the >>one that I need? >>I only installed the base amount of software: >> gcc-2_95_2-2.tar.gz >> cygwin-1.1.2.tar.gz >> binutils-20000625.tar.gz >> bash-2_04_1.tar.gz >>I thought that should be enough but maybe not. >>Also, since I am only getting the digest version of this mailing list, >>can you cc: me directly? > >I don't know what cygwin commands you could be running if you only >installed "the base amount of software". Certainly you couldn't run >'ls' if you didn't install it. You are right, I did not realize that the binutils did not have a set of commands. It turns out that I was running commands that came with an old version of the MKS toolkit that I had in my path. So I installed some other cygwin utils. I tried to run size and ps among others. However, I just realized, shouldn't I be able to run any command whether it was a cygwin command or not as long as it was in my path? > >>Also, since I am only getting the digest version of this mailing list, can >>you cc: me directly? > >Sure, as long as you stop Cc'ing me directly. I read the cygwin mailing >list. There is no reason to get two copies. sorry about cc'ing you directly. Won't happen again. > >cgf Thanks for all of your suggestions. This is driving me crazy!! glenn davis. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com