Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 00:25:37 -0400
From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: Re: Extending cygwin's process table (progress report)
Message-ID: <20000724002537.A24506@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
References: <20000718234319 DOT A16333 AT cygnus DOT com> <20000724001546 DOT A24454 AT cygnus DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <20000724001546.A24454@cygnus.com>; from cgf@cygnus.com on Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 12:15:46AM -0400

On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 12:15:46AM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote:
>Ok.  I have pulled apart cygwin's process table creation and
>reimplemented everything using windows pids.  The result is pretty
>incredible.

I should point out that many other times when I've done something to
cygwin that resulted in a big performance increase, the reason was
that I'd stupidly forgotten some crucial detail.

Hopefully that isn't the case here.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com