Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <50028CAE26D1D3118C7F00A0CC50D6252D1E4C@EMWARESERVER> From: Scott Carter To: "'cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com'" Subject: RE: make --win32 incorrectly handles PATH Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 17:01:41 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Thanks for the replies. You're right of course. FREE software is offered on a take-it-or-leave-it basis. You've given me some ammo that I can now take to my "management" and make an argument for either a) investing a little more time to try to get this version of make working like we want, or b) using something else. We already looked at the most obvious "something else" options and eliminated them -- we can't freely distribute nmake, and trying to support a dozen different IDE's is a nightmare. We chose gnu make because it's freely distributable and widely used/understood (as much a defacto standard as anything I'm aware of). And we moved to the cygwin port because the development platforms we support are WinNT/98, our users aren't necessarily computer sophisticated, and we don't want to push any more unix-style notation on them than we have to (yeah, I know -- I prefer unix too). I'll try to persuade my boss for permission to delve "under the hood" of make. If I'm successful, and I come up with some fixes or suggestions, I'll certainly share them. Regards, Scott Carter Software Engineer > ----- Forwarded message from Chris Faylor ----- > > From: Chris Faylor > To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > Subject: Re: make --win32 incorrectly handles PATH > Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 16:44:03 -0400 > Reply-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com > Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > In-Reply-To: <200007202038 DOT QAA32487 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>; > from dj AT delorie DOT com on Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 04:38:06PM -0400 > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 04:38:06PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > >> d) With my apologies to "FREE" software proponents everywhere, my > >> company exists to profit from non-free software. > > > >No need to apologize. You are free to make whichever choices you > >wish, just as we are free to choose otherwise. > > Right. > > I was offering you an option for solving your problem, i.e., jumping > in and debugging the problem yourself. > > You've offered several reasons why that is not possible, which is fine. > > I'm sure that you understand that your inability to debug this does > not mean that someone else will step in to solve the problem that you > have uncovered. > > Maybe someone will be motivated to look into this. Unfortunately, > I really can't do it right now or for the foreseeable future. > > cgf > > ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com