Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <99B82AA9708ED0119B55006097125A00363EDB@ifk63.mach.uni-karlsruhe.de> From: Heribert Dahms To: "'cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com'" Subject: RE: Extending cygwin's process table Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 23:26:41 +0200 X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1457.3) Content-Type: text/plain Hi Chris, I don't bother. I dunno if PID 1is special to NT, but my System process is currently 2, FWIW. In case of a problematic PID assigned, perhaps retry creating another process first, then terminate the original? Bye, Heribert (heribert_dahms AT icon-gmbh DOT de) > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Faylor [SMTP:cgf AT cygnus DOT com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 05:43 > To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > Subject: Extending cygwin's process table > > I am planning on revamping cygwin's process table for version 1.1.4. > I hope to make process creation a little faster and to also allow many > more cygwin processes. > > I'm also toying with trying to more closely tie cygwin pids to windows > pids. > > Is anyone going to be bothered if pid creation is not monotonic? By > that I mean, parent pid 1000 may not create child pid 1001. It may > create child pid 27. > > It may still not be feasible to use cygwin pids as windows pids > (possibly because I don't believe that pid 1 is special to windows) > but > I thought I'd give this a try anyway unless there is something that > I'm > missing. > > cgf > > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com