Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Lotus-FromDomain: JPMORGAN AT SMTP From: "Noel L Yap" To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <85256921.0047DAC3.00@nyc-ntgw-n01.ny.jpmorgan.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 09:04:55 -0400 Subject: Re: Extending cygwin's process table Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline cgf AT cygnus DOT com on 2000.07.18 23:43:19 >I'm also toying with trying to more closely tie cygwin pids to windows >pids. IMHO, this'd be great. >Is anyone going to be bothered if pid creation is not monotonic? By >that I mean, parent pid 1000 may not create child pid 1001. It may >create child pid 27. I don't think anything should be relying on this behaviour since it's not always satisfied (ie when ppid is near the max pid allowed). >It may still not be feasible to use cygwin pids as windows pids >(possibly because I don't believe that pid 1 is special to windows) but >I thought I'd give this a try anyway unless there is something that I'm >missing. Yeah, I'm not sure if it's possible, but it's worth a shot (unless someone out there knows for sure that it's not possible). Noel This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated, its subsidiaries and affiliates. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com