Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 21:33:30 -0400 To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: July 17th snapshot Message-ID: <20000718213330.D14863@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com References: <20000719000144 DOT 9048 DOT qmail AT web4601 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20000719000144.9048.qmail@web4601.mail.yahoo.com>; from s_m_siddiqi@yahoo.com on Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 05:01:44PM -0700 On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 05:01:44PM -0700, Suhaib Siddiqi wrote: >Well, XFree seems to be more stable with July 17th >snapshot, is not time to have a Cygwin 1.1.3 ? ;-) Btw, one of the changes that I made to cygwin in the 7/17 snapshot was to detect when a "system call" like open(), stat(), chmod(), etc. is passed an invalid pointer and set the EFAULT errno rather than SEGVing within cygwin itself. I noticed that that seemed to make XFree work better but that is a sign that some functions are being passed bogus stuff. In particular, I noticed this with chown(). cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com