Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: "Stefan Norberg" To: "cygwin" Subject: RE: Openssh port to cygwin Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 19:13:01 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <39711E8A.451C96EA@digisle.net> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 I can't explain why, but when I changed my shell from bash (bash.exe) to ash (sh.exe) the NT executables ran in the foreground so to speak. Stefan Norberg > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com > [mailto:cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com]On Behalf Of JJ Streicher-Bremer > Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2000 4:32 AM > To: cygwin > Cc: norbert DOT bladt AT usa DOT net > Subject: Re: Openssh port to cygwin > > > I have been using the b20 and Sergey's port of sshd with great success. > In my efforts to get openssh running on 1.1.2 I have noticed that the > net.exe command no longer runs the same way. Instead of running inside > the shell (I am using bash) it spawns a separate console for the app. > This has the effect of making the output inaccessible from the remote > shell. > > I have set CYGWIN to be: > CYGWIN='tty binmode title strip_title glob ntsec ntea' > > I am running Win2K. I see that the command "net user" spawns a new > shell, yet "net use" does not. Have you run into this before? > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks > JJ Streicher-Bremer > > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > norbert DOT bladt AT usa DOT net wrote: > > > > > > Hello everyone ! > > > > > > Openssh on NT works very well, unless you are trying to > > > use /winnt/system32/cmd instead of /bin/sh or > > > unless you use real NT commands from the sh. > > > > > > In this case, no input / output redirection is possible, > > > neither on UNIX nor - once logged in - on NT. > > > Using "cygwin-enabled" GNU commands works fine, though. > > > > > > Now my questions are: > > > Is this the intended behaviour ? > > > If not what can be the reason or - with other words - do > > > just I see this behaviour or is it the same for everybody else ? > > > > > > We really want to execute NT commands like "net use" or > > > "net stop snmp", etc. from remote UNIX or NT host via ssh. > > > Is this a bad idea and if yes, why ? > > > Are there other WORKING solutions for that which are secure ? > > > > I'm using nt commands via ssh without problems as far as they > > are not GUI commands. CLI tools like `net' are working _mostly_ > > fine. Some commands like `sc' sometimes have dubious problems > > with their output. > > > > Try setting the environment variable CYGWIN so that it contains > > `tty'. This might help. > > > > Corinna > > > > -- > > Corinna Vinschen > > Cygwin Developer > > Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company > > > > -- > > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > > -- > ------------------------------ > And root said rm -rf / ...... > and there was nothing > ------------------------------ > > *editors note: there were no UNIX > systems injured in the creation of > this tagline. > > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com