Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <39711E8A.451C96EA@digisle.net> Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 19:31:38 -0700 From: JJ Streicher-Bremer X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin CC: norbert DOT bladt AT usa DOT net Subject: Re: Openssh port to cygwin References: <20000710113445 DOT 18876 DOT qmail AT nwcst313 DOT netaddress DOT usa DOT net> <3969C562 DOT CBB5AAD AT cygnus DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have been using the b20 and Sergey's port of sshd with great success. In my efforts to get openssh running on 1.1.2 I have noticed that the net.exe command no longer runs the same way. Instead of running inside the shell (I am using bash) it spawns a separate console for the app. This has the effect of making the output inaccessible from the remote shell. I have set CYGWIN to be: CYGWIN='tty binmode title strip_title glob ntsec ntea' I am running Win2K. I see that the command "net user" spawns a new shell, yet "net use" does not. Have you run into this before? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks JJ Streicher-Bremer Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > norbert DOT bladt AT usa DOT net wrote: > > > > Hello everyone ! > > > > Openssh on NT works very well, unless you are trying to > > use /winnt/system32/cmd instead of /bin/sh or > > unless you use real NT commands from the sh. > > > > In this case, no input / output redirection is possible, > > neither on UNIX nor - once logged in - on NT. > > Using "cygwin-enabled" GNU commands works fine, though. > > > > Now my questions are: > > Is this the intended behaviour ? > > If not what can be the reason or - with other words - do > > just I see this behaviour or is it the same for everybody else ? > > > > We really want to execute NT commands like "net use" or > > "net stop snmp", etc. from remote UNIX or NT host via ssh. > > Is this a bad idea and if yes, why ? > > Are there other WORKING solutions for that which are secure ? > > I'm using nt commands via ssh without problems as far as they > are not GUI commands. CLI tools like `net' are working _mostly_ > fine. Some commands like `sc' sometimes have dubious problems > with their output. > > Try setting the environment variable CYGWIN so that it contains > `tty'. This might help. > > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen > Cygwin Developer > Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company > > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com -- ------------------------------ And root said rm -rf / ...... and there was nothing ------------------------------ *editors note: there were no UNIX systems injured in the creation of this tagline. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com